Drained, and no refill in sight

Tonight I’m utterly drained and have nothing more to give; the last three days having taken everything out of me. Even typing this takes more than I want to spend.

On Friday I spent an hour on the phone with Karen, who is slowly dying of the cumulative effects of her ex-husband’s attempt to kill her. She’s 95% biker bitch and 5% baby Christian, but I know God can work with that. However, it’s exhausting to combat the “spirit(s)” at work and minister the person and work of Christ to a justifiably angry woman who has lost hope and faces a slow debilitating death. Yet, ministry is letting Christ chose whom we are to love.

Then I spend the weekend with Devin, trying to build a foundation for a relationship with someone who is quite different from me. On Saturday night I tried to talk with her father, who was tipsy drunk and played mental and spiritual games like my father. With speech loaded with humanism delivered in Christinese, he proceeded to play the challenge-via-insinuation game; never really saying what he was so clearly saying, making a lot of “Dragon-like statement” (as Driscoll would put it), but still affirming me before taking me down again. But as he said, he’d had enough to drink that he was honest. As for me, I see right through his self-loathing impositions on me and those around him. I see right through his alcoholic need for a non-judgmental environment. When he said, “Your pursuit, your concern, with ‘right’ and ‘wrong,’ and ‘black’ and ‘white’ will be your undoing.”  That statement says so much I could write a small book on it, or at least a whole ‘nother post.

Then on the way home I spend another hour and fourty minutes with Karen again, who by now is doing much better thanks to the Holy Spirit and God’s orchestration of putting Christians in her miserable life to try and talk some “hope in Christ” into her. I didn’t get home until almost 3AM and didn’t get to sleep until 4AM, my mind still buzzing with that gut-kick feeling normally only get after a bad visit with my Dad.

Sunday, with four hours sleep, I finally talk to my brother Tim who tells me that he’s “not suicidal but would be happy if it all ended.” My gut was wrenched in that same way when my ol’ best friend was saying the same things. So I listen to his never-ending depression for his never-ending entanglement with troubled mother of three who has been “dying” of one cancerous malady or another for the last eight years. He’s made this woman his life, with no boundaries, to his own destruction. With the death of his brother last November, he’s looking at every one and everything as, “what if this is the last time I see or get to be with so-n-so?” and he start breaking down in tears again. And again, I give more.

But when I got to work I was drained. I put in several hours from home, but that’s it. I’ve been gut-kicked and wiped out. What saddens me further is the part of me, the voice inside, that tells me I deserve all this an worse. Maybe God is visiting upon me pain I’ve caused others. I don’t know.

Maybe I’ll blog later, maybe not. Blogging is just one more “busyness” thing to do in our chaotic world and not worth my health. I don’t give a rats ass right now in my exhaustion who the hell want me to blog. Facebook is enough.

So for now the phone goes off. The email goes quiet, and I go into self-preservation mode to simply survive this draining mini-bought of depression and emotional exhaustion. No one can help me. Everyone I know is a spiritual taker, or at least an exchanger, but not a giver. No one will do for me what I do for everyone else: just listen and then soothingly comfort me with love, in Christ.

Posted in Ministry, Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Look like it’s time to leave my church

Sometime around last fall (2008) I began attending a small up-start church a few miles from where I live. Since becoming Reformed, I’ve found it very hard to find a church, but even more difficult is one that accepts divorce/remarried men into ministry. I would have settled for a church that wasn’t explicitly Reformed but didn’t teach against what I believe, as long as they don’t practice interminable non-restoration of men who are divorced and repentant where needed.

After attending a few times, I met with the pastor on Friday morning to explain what I was looking for in a church, my past, and my hopes for a grace-based church. To my delight, he explained that they were now independent of their parent church and that neither he nor the elders (to his knowledge) were completely against divorced or even remarried men in leadership. I’ll admit, I got watery eyes, as I felt I’d found a home in a young church or perhaps 120 people.

Earlier this year, around February, I told the pastor about what some ideas I had for things to present at the church and some ministry ideas. He was receptive and asked me to email his the ideas I had. I spent four weeks consulting with friends and praying over how to respond. On Sunday, March 1, I sent my email with my friends’ responses, desires and ideas for serving.

No response.

About two months later my pastor informs me that they’re putting together a membership initiative (a first for the two year old church) and I offered to help with researching the membership initiative process or anything else they needed. Knowing my theological background, the pastor was enthusiastic and told me that I might be invited to join the elders (not as a member of course) to help form the process. We talked about a couple issues and I left encouraged at a chance to serve. A couple weeks later, I followed up with an email that I spend transcribing from a John Piper sermon membership qualifications as it relates to the qualification for membership in the universal body of Christ (i.e., salvation).

Two days later I go my first and only response from my church. Ever. He merely thanked me for the “great nugget” mined from Piper, and an offer to “plan to get together” after he returned from camping.

I never heard back.

Last Sunday the sermondevotional was so bad I almost left five minutes into the series of obnoxious attempts at “ice breaker” humor. But I stuck through the anemic message, which only bore tangential reference to the text allegedly in focus, and made it through to the end. Though people know me, I’m not married and don’t have kids for their kids to play with so few people have any reason to fellowship with me, or so it seems few are interested in the single guy. But I struck up a conversation with one of the elders (the only one in attendance) and explained that I hadn’t heard back. Honestly, with how I’ve been ignored, I explained, it was hard not to think that it was that old divorce and remarriage issue cropping up again, hidden, unseen and unspoken, in the background. He felt bad an assured me that wasn’t the case. This lead to a conversation on divorce, remarriage and ministry, and I was delighted that he held a view consistent with the pastor. He, too, expressed a sense of urgency at the time running out before the pastor’s intent to preach about membership as early as September. He even stated that he’s personally welcome my offer to “drive” the process with schedules and such; similar to the project management I do at work. So he promised to email the other elders, the two pastors and me that very Sunday night, with a specific request for me to follow up with them all on my ideas, a prospective schedule, and a couple of personal notes on some issues we discussed. The more we talked the more certain he reiterated his plan to send an email that very night and for me to reply the same night, just as we discussed.

It’s now the following Friday and I’ve heard nothing.

I. Give. Up. On. These. Flakes.

But where do I go?  Start my own?  THAT is an option that has seen increasing discussion lately.  Hey, at this point I’d be happy to gather around a Driscoll podcast with a bunch of guys every Sunday.

UPDATE 8/2: I came home at almost three in the morning to an email from the elder in question letting me know that he’s mistyped my email address a week ago. He included, of course, the email I was originally sent. I’ll blog it separately.

Posted in Ministry, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

The King & I: Parallels and Inspiration 2,600 Years Later

In the earliest years of my faith in Christ, during high school, God led me to the short story of young King Josiah and the finding of the “Book of the Law” while rebuilding the temple.

It would take two decades for me to understand the parallels and significance in my life.

Born in 649 BC, Josiah’s father, King Amon, and grandfather, King Manasseh, both “did what was evil in the sight of the LORD” (2 Kings 21:20).  The Lord ordained that Josiah lose his father at young age. The wicked King Amon was murdered when Josiah was only eight.  Josiah “began to seek the God of David” in his mid-teens. (2 Chron. 34:3).  As the Word declares, “he did not turn aside to the right or to the left” (2 Kings 22:2) and he became the last Godly King over the God’s chosen people before the Lord exiled His people. His clearing the kingdom of idols foreshadows Christ clearing the Temple and His ultimate clearing of sin in His coming Kingdom. I, too, was born to a father and grandfather who turned from the Lord, experienced pre-adolescent alienation from my father, yet the LORD sought me in my mid-teens. When I originally studied this character during my late teens the LORD impressed the story of Josiah upon me so greatly that I wanted live up to Josiah’s example and also name my first son in his honor.

What was the event that propelled Josiah from God-seeking young man into the great leader of God? What so deeply convicted him that he changed not only his own life, but used his influence over those around him to return a people to the Lord?

The life-changing, nation-turning event was this:  He found a lost Book, but not just any book.

In 633 B.C., Hilkiah the High Priest found a lost copy of the “Book of the Law” in the “house of the LORD” (the Temple) which was undergoing repairs.  He gave the Book to Shaphan, his secretary, who present to King Josiah and read it.  Now about age 24, Josiah had already been “seeking” the LORD for almost ten years, was already living in the fear of the LORD and thus likely knew of the Book of the Law.

Yet something about finding this particular “Book of the Law” provoked a reaction in young king Josiah that would change his life, the course of a nation, and even stay the judgment hand of God.  Something shook him to the core at hearing the Word of the Lord read from the unexpected find of an irreplaceable written record of the spiritual legacy of his forefathers.  Josiah tore his closes in renewed repentance and became a strong leader for God through driving out the idolatrous practices in the land, restoring right worship of the Lord .

I thought the story and the parallels ended there; an inspiring moral story tucked away in my head.  Now, two decades and many revelations later, the Lord has shown me even more.

Over the past five years the legacy of my great-grandfather, Rev. Joseph Burrows, has meant more to me with every passing year.  I’ve traveled back to where he preached, visited his grave, met some old ladies who knew him and stood where he preached three generations ago.  As I grow in knowledge of the Word and matured in Christ, I feel ever more called to continue his legacy and go into ministry.  Yet all I had were some pictures and what limited information my ailing grandmother (Rev. Burrows’ last surviving child) could provide from her fragmented memories.  In the year before her death I had a repeating daydream of someday telling my grandmother that I was entering ministry and in response I pictured her handing off to me the most precious physical connection to my great-grandfather that I could image: his personal preaching Bible. This dream was so strong and flourished with such detail that in the summer before her death I asked if she knew what has become of his Bible. She assured me that she had no such thing and it was likely lost to time. In February 2008 she went to be with Jesus at the age of 83.

Then, like my spiritual hero Josiah, I also found a book which is changing my life.

With the family gathered in my grandmother’s apartment where she had passed just days prior, the greedy process of pillaging through her life’s possessions began. Unconcerned about jewelry, clothes or other things of “value,” I sought the irreplaceable: the pictures, postcards, and letters that document a life lived. We neared completion of divvying up her belongings when my cousin pulled a small red box from inside the TV cabinet.  When she opened it she recognized it as a Bible and handed it to me (she knows I’m a strong Christian and would probably want such a thing). Opening the cover, the inside page simply read, “Joseph Burrows, April 14th, 1914.” Thumbing through the pages confirmed what seemed  impossible: the Bible was indeed his preaching Bible, complete with sermon outlines and lesson notes!  This one Bible—once thought lost to the chaos of time—about which I’d so often dreamed of holding, that symbolized the passing on of a legacy of ministry,  was preserved by the Lord in His Grace and Sovereignty and now sitting in my hands.  In my daydream, which I now see as prophetic, my grandmother handed this once-imagined copy of the Word to me with a loving smile and watery eyes that told me, “You’re ready for this.”  Since finding the Bible—this particular Bible—I’ve felt that now that the dream has come true, so should the meaning behind it.

Last week, feeling somehow called to re-read the story of Josiah again for the first time on a couple decades, two amazing parallels hit me. First, the discovery of Rev. Burrows’ preaching Bible greatly parallels Josiah’s finding of the “Bible” of his day. I don’t know why, perhaps just the working of God, but I in the 17 months since I found the Bible I never realized the parallels.  Second, in the text (2 Chronicles and 2 Kings)  I discovered another parallel in family history. Using online Bibles with great cross-references (an advantage I didn’t have, nor would I have used, in my teens) I traced back Josiah’s lineage a little further. As the LORD showed me, in addition to a godless father and grandfather, Josiah had a Godly great-grandfather, King Hezekiah, who “did what was right in the eyes of the Lord, according to all that David his father had done.” (2 Kings 18:3).  I was stunned.  Josiah and I both had Godly great-grandfathers, only that mine is matrilineal rather than patrilineal as was the case for Josiah.

I can only imagine what God has to show me, or do with me, next.

Posted in Ministry, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Sexting: A front line in male-targeted prosecution

So today we have another story about the “epidemic” of “sexting” (taking sexually oriented pictures and sending them via cell phone text message).  Apparently, sexting is all the rage in today’s schools, right on down to middle school.  From what I’ve read, the new sign of going steady is for the girl to fire up the cell phone cam, snap a nude or semi nude picture, and “sext” it to her new beau. Please note, that in many cases the girl either takes the pictures herself or willfully poses for it and sends the text message.  In other words, as far as the production and distribution of child pornography via “sexting,” the girls are every bit as involved as the boys.

But prosecutors — educated in today’s feminist universities — don’t see it that way, as evidenced by the fact the nearly universally only the boys are charged with the heavy-hitting felonies that can arise from such cases.  Case du jour is the article in today’s Boston Herald where prosecutors are charging six boys in such a case; one for taking the picture, the other five for being involved:

The six boys, ages 12 to 14, will be summoned to Falmouth District Court for a hearing to determine whether they should be charged with possessing, exhibiting or distributing child porn in the form of a text message photo, according to The Cape Cod Times.

Notice that the prosecutor limits the charges to “possessing, exhibiting or distributing” the picture, because if he included the other charge (production of child porn) then he woul have had to charge the girl, too, and we certainly can’t have that now can we?

Columbia University Professor Sari Locker said surveys suggest one in five teens has sent or received nude or semi-nude pictures.

One. In. five. Wow.

“When boys receive a nude picture of a girl, they think the next time they see her they can go further with her in a sexual way than before,” she said. “It becomes an invitation to advance a sexual relationship.”

No kidding? We should not be surprised that young boys think getting to the proverbial third base is a sure-shot when the girl herself makes second base as easy a “sext” message.  Note that the professor here intimates that the boys who receives the sext porn from the girl is somehow assuming something too far simply because he receives sext porn from the girl.

I can hear the feminazi school counselor now, “What? You assumed she was OK with getting sexual just because she stripped in front of the bathroom mirror and sext’d you the nudie shot? Sheesh, where’d you ever get that idea?” No wonder today’s boys are such a sad, brow-beaten lot of sexually confused p-whipped beta males.

But Locker said she believes criminal charges are excessive: “Clearly these boys are not sexual predators or pedophiles.”

Nor, aparently, are the girl willing models in child porn. Oh no. They’re the “victims” of the boys, you see.

This just proves the sexual revolution of a generation ago was all about freedom and zero about responsibility — for women and girls at least.

Posted in Culture Commentary, War on Men | Leave a comment

Niebhur Updated for Today’s Crossless Christianity

In 1937 Yale Divinity School professor and deep-thinking theologian H. Richard Niebuhr published “Kingdom of God in America” in which he summed up the liberal Christianity with this now famous quote:

A God without wrath
brought men without sin
into a Kingdom without judgment
through the ministrations of a Christ without a Cross.

This theology gave birth to the so-called “social gospel” and the idea that saving people meant making them more good, in their own eyes of course. Now, some 70 years later, Christians and the mainstream churches they attend start with the premise that humans are good at our core and merely in need of the right machinations to morally right ourselves and make God as happy with us as we our with ourselves.

Today, I’m saddened to see the growing trend in Churches to remodel the sanctuary as a theatre with the front as a multipurpose stage; sans cross. This goes along with the rise in self-help, self-esteem (and ultimately, self-salvation) we see in today’s moralist therapeutic deism. So, with Niebhur in mind, I have pondered a response based on what I see in today’s evangelical self-help clubs:

A preacher without a law
advised a congregation without guilt
about a life without sacrifice
from behind a pulpit without a Cross.

Posted in Of First Importance: The Gospel | Leave a comment

Disappointed by Scripture: Another example of Pentecostalism in practice

In the 10 or more years it’s been since I left Pentecostalism (baptized Assemblies of God, 1991), and in pursuing Reformed thought since early 2000′s, I’ve been continually taken aback at the two hallmarks of charismatic/Pentecostal practice: Low regard for the scripture and the heavy role of neo-gnosticism (usually in extra-biblical revelation or superstition).

For those not familiar, “Gnostic” (pronounced “NOSS-tic”) thought and practice arose in the early centuries of the church. Central to their belief system—among other dangerous and heretical ideas—was the belief the true spiritual enlightenment came through so-called “special revelation” which was given outside of, and often in contradiction to, Scripture. Forerunners of today’s Pentecostals, the Gnostics and their schismatic offshoots proved especially damaging to the early church precisely because they challenged the Church from within.

So in the Fall of 2008 I popped in on a local church to see what was up. They’re a former Vineyard church (Arminian/Pentecostal) that had left the Association of Vineyard Churches over the issue of male headship in the Church (good for them!) and then joined Acts 29 church planting network founded by Mark Driscoll of Seattle’s Mars Hill Church. Having listened to Mark Driscoll for many years, I know he describes himself as “charismatic with a seat belt” and that Acts 29 is both charismatic-friendly while holding to Reformed understanding of key issues.

After the usual worship the pastor took the mic and invited something like the following:

“Now if there’s anyone here who has a vision or word form the Lord that they’d like to share, or, uh, even just a Scripture? Just stand up and…”

Wait. “Just a Scripture?” If you could have heard his tone it sounded like, “Does anyone have a vision? That would be great, and so would a ‘word’ from God… but, we’ll settle for a Scripture, too” (with the implied “if that’s all we can get”). I quickly figured that I was the only one in the room that understood what was so terribly wrong here: The precious, inspired, inerrant, Word of the Lord which we are entrusted to guard had been reduced to, “just a Scripture”; a second-class spiritual accessory, now upstaged by “visions” or an extra-Biblical (i.e., non-inspired) “words” from the Lord. This, my friends, is Pentecostalism.

But it gets better (or worse, depending on your take). Almost immediately a middle-aged gentleman stood up with an alleged “vision”:

“I have a vision of someone with a cast or, uh, injury to their right arm. Is there someone here with a broken arm?”

Silence fell as he looked around to no answer from his enrapt fellow audience members.

“Maybe someone here knows someone with a broken arm or something?”

No one.

“Ok, um, perhaps someone is just struggling with something, uh, perhaps feeling broken or, uh, something like that?”

So we’ve gone from a specific “vision” and interpretation to something as nebulous and common as “feeling broken.”  The false prophet with an apparently meaningless vision went on about some pseudo-spiritual talk while I tuned out and zipped up my Bible to head out the door. As I left I thought, “Boy, if this doesn’t typify the Pentecostal experience, I don’t know what does.”

  • Scripture, which has total inerrancy as the standard, is reduced to second-in-importance status behind personal, prophetic experience;
  • The rock solid standard of “Thus saith the Lord” (the confidence demonstrated by Biblical prophets in the Bible) has been downgraded to vapid pronouncements of the all-too-common, for the unquestioning consumption of congregants who think nothing wrong of a spiritual life consisting of “God told me so… uh, I think.”

Want to see what it’s like when a real man of God hears from God? John Piper really did hear from God and wrote an awesome recounting of the experience (read his post, it’s great). About two-thirds into his post you realized that the soul-moving Word he received from God was, in fact, Psalm 66:5-7. Yet how many Christians today would have reacted in disappointment as I confess that would have muttered: “Psalms sixty-what? Huh? That’s just a Scripture. I was expecting…” Yeah, “just a Scripture” again. I, too, was one of the millions of Christians who felt a tidbit of let-down when expecting a “word” but “only” got Scripture. But Piper knows well that many would have just such a reaction to his pronouncement of hearing from God, and so he laments:

The great need of our time is for people to experience the living reality of God by hearing his word personally and transformingly in Scripture. Something is incredibly wrong when the words we hear outside Scripture are more powerful and more affecting to us than the inspired word of God.

Well said.

Chalk it all up to one more example of why I’m no longer Pentecostal.

Posted in Charismania | Leave a comment

A Voice in the Cloud of Witnesses: On The Passing of Scottie Sayles

Earlier this evening I was thinking of the brother in Lord who played a key role in my coming to Christ.  I met Scottie in the mid-1980′s when I attended YMCA Camp Campbell, where I heard the gospel for the first time. Like many hyperactive kids blasting through a week at camp, I didn’t have much focus on the Gospel; but I heard it. Scottie, a big guy with a big heart, served on the camp leadership team for trips to Camp Campbell and other Y camps over the years. He was big and goofy. The kids related to him, perhaps not so much a father figure (as some of the camp directors) but more like a hearty old brother or maybe a jolly uncle. I loved him.

One evening, after yet another campfire-side Gospel presentation, I was lying in my bunk bed in the open air cabins of Camp Fox on Catalina Island. Just a few weeks from entering high school, I knew the God was impressing upon me the Truth that God sent Christ to die for me and that I was called to life in Him.  As the Lord had arranged it, my top bunk faced the waterfront of this camp built right on the beach.  Laying in my bunk, watching the calm ocean front, I pondered life as a Christian and some of the objections and concerns I had.

After all were asleep, Scottie came walking along the retaining wall, doing after-hours rounds watching over the camp.

“Scottie?” I called to him in a forced whisper as he passed right in front of me.

“Yeah, Phil?” he answered as he turned to look right at me.

Now staring at him eye-to-eye from my top bunk, I asked, “What if it’s not true?  What if Christianity isn’t true?”

I’m now positive that he somehow knew that I was one of those kids on the verge of accepting Christ, as he’d seen me through to my brown rag in the Ragger program (Y folks know what I mean).With a soft and encouraging voice he said through a smile, “You know, even if it’s not [true], it’s not a bad way to live life.

That’s all I really remember of the conversation, other than him telling me good night as he walked away.  It was almost two decades later, when I ran into him in a local grocery store, that I told him that just after he’d walked away I accepted Christ. That was the last time I remember seeing him.

Tonight, I googled him only to find that on June 23, 2007 there was a memorial held for him at a nearby Little League field.  An email response from the event organizer confirmed what had hit stunned me an hour earlier: Scottie Sayles, my brother, humble witness to thousand of kids, the man whose kind words had comforted me as I embraced Christ, was himself ushered into the comforting arms of Christ on May 12, 2007.

Whenever I think of my brothers and sisters in the Lord who are now with Christ, the Holy Spirit often brings to mind this verse:

Therefore, since we are surrounded by such a great cloud of witnesses, let us throw off everything that hinders and the sin that so easily entangles, and let us run with perseverance the race marked out for us.” (Hebrews 12:1 NIV)

The passing of our brothers and sisters in Christ should, according to this passage, cause us to disentangle ourselves from the snares of this world and press on in the mission of Christ. As every believer goes on to the place Christ has prepared for them, the mission passes more pressingly on we who remain. As I consider ministry, I now have Scottie joining the choir of believers above me, spurring me on: “Throw off everything and run, brother, the race is yours now.”

Though Scottie and I shared many meals in the big dining rooms of a couple Y camps, I shall next see him at the wedding feast of the Lamb and His Bride. There, apart from sin and pain, we shall fellowship once again, forever.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Tomlin vs. Watts

I’ve removed this entry due to concerns about the accuracy of the information presented, which drive some of my conclusion. Specifically, after some follow-up comments, it’s uncertain what exactly Isaac Watts wrote (“I” vs. “we”) in his original hymn. Since a 1962 hymnal has the song in first person (“I”), Chris Tomlin clearly didn’t alter the lyrics.

I may re-release this posts commenting on the other valid criticisms of what’s been done to this classic hymn. But for now, the inaccurate information presented here has been removed. My apologies to anyone how might have be been mislead or harmed by anything I’d presented.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Divorce, Ministry and The Tragedy of Interminable Non-Restoration

Earlier this evening I spent time with my friend Tim, with whom I’ve become reconnected after several years of being apart. Tim still goes to the same Assemblies of God (“A/G”) church in which we met and I was baptized in 1991. Since that time I’ve left Pentecostalism in the late 1990′s for Evangelicalism, and then moved to the Reformed faith in 2003 (shortly after Tim and I broke contact).

Now, with Tim in a church with Pentecostal holiness heritage—and all the baggage that goes with it—I wondered how we would relate as brothers. Not only would the Reformed-vs.-Arminian angle become an issue, but Pentecostalism’s notorious mistreatment of divorce persons would rear its head at some point. But God had worked in him to impart a level of Gospel-grace that transcends the self-righteous religiosity in which his denomination operates.

To give him an idea of how I viewed religion vs. Gospel, I played Mark Driscoll’s outstanding “Why I hate Religion” sermon clip. He loved it, so I played the Tolerance Rant, too.

This evening, the divorce issue came to a head; for him because he’s considering dating a divorced woman, for me because some day I would like marry again. So I went to the official Assemblies of God website to show him where his church stands, where his money is going, what he’s up against and how his best friend is viewed by his church organization. A quick site search on “divorce” returns an August 10, 2001 news item: 49th General Council report: Divorce/remarriage resolution passes. The resolution is supposed to “permit men and women who were divorced before conversion to pursue ministerial credentials with the Assemblies of God.”

We analyzed the article together.
Continue reading

Posted in Divorce & Remarriage, Ministry | 2 Comments

The Opening Salvo

After six years camping on this domain and debating what to do with it, now is the time to launch.

History: In May 2001 I sat in Togos noshing on a pastrami reuben while trying to come up with a cool name for a personal web site; a name that did not personally identify me. Many domain names are noun-based, but I wanted something with a verb, or at least based on a verb. My snarky pseudo-intellectual side wanted something Greek or Latin, since most of the content here would relate to Christian theology or philosphy. I asked, “How do you say ‘to say‘ something in Greek? or Latin?”  After a while I came to “eloquor” which in Latin means something like “to express.”  After a dozen lame attempts at conjugating “eloquor” it struck me: eloquorium, a place of expression. Eloquoirum! It sounded so smooth, but even better, no one owned the domain name yet! Finding an unowned domain wasn’t easy, even back in 2001; about 35,000 domains a day were being registered.

Distinctives: I never intended Eloquorium to be the typical Christian blog. In topic and tone, always wanted it to be edgy and engaging. More Mark Driscoll than Al Mohler.   This represents an intentional departure from the sterilized “safe for the whole family” extra-Bibilcal moralism that governs the content of most Christian blogs.

Future: I have a few ideas where I want to go with this site. Initially, this will be my own personal Wittenberg Door; the place to nail my jeremiads and banter. But I’m considering another route, as I may open the site to other Christian authors. The so-called “team blog” concept has many attractions, but I’d lose the personal flavor of the site, too. But one of the driving reasons I may open the site to both regular and guest authors is to allow these individuals to post/discuss things that they can’t talk about on their normal “Christian” blog. Perhaps they have something to say, but don’t want their blog attacked by the growing number of self-appointed, vicious, watch-bloggers.  I know there are Godly Christian bloggers out there who want to say controversial things, but don’t want their blog blacklistsed and blasted. Thought I haven’t yet decided to open Eloquorium to other writers, I do want to see them have a voice and use that voice without fear.

Posted in Announcements | 2 Comments